Back to Squawk list
  • 44

Tailwind and poor braking present before ERJ-145 excursion

Preliminary indications suggest the Envoy Air Embraer ERJ-145 which suffered a runway excursion at Chicago O'Hare had landed with a tailwind in gusting conditions. ( More...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

airuphere 8
If you watch the video... looks like they should of kept going on the rwy - breaking action wasn’t good enough for that high speed taxi way.. they had runway left..
Video Link FYI —>>.
Matt Kladder 6
I also am of the opinion that there is NO way they were trying to turn off on a reverse high speed on snowy conditions. They appear to have begun to lost control long before they were at P4,
william baker 3
Like i said before they were trying to turn off at P4 from what the FAA was saying and i got yelled at for it. They were going way to fast for that turn off in any conditions.
Andy Bowland 3
P4 would have been a reverse high speed for them...almost no way they were trying to turn off.
John Kiger 4
Only a 9Kt tailwind. However the 24Kt gusting crosswind on a marginal surface condition could be fun.....
Jason Bowman 3
I bet they just weathervaned in the crosswind.
ppcflyer777 1
That's what it looks like. I believe they said the runway condition at the time was 1/1/1
Sven Freitag 1
9 kts tailwind is quite substantial, most airlines consider 10 an absolute cutoff as far as I know.
Those conditions can bite the best of of pilots. Just because the previous traffic made it means nothing to the next guy. That said, the pilots will bear the heat, barring a mechanical failure, just because,
am I wrong, I do not see the spoilers being deployed
Andy Bowland 2
The outer panels are just that...panels. The spoilers are deployed right at the bottom of the screen or at the wind root.
Tanman3880 2
If you look at the AV herald article (link below) it shows an aerial image of O'Hare and the "approximate final position" of the plane. It appears that the plane veered left and skidded off on the "N-1" turn off which appears to be for planes landing on 28R (opposite direction). I'm no expert. Scary for sure.
mbrews 2
- Given the runway conditions and possible tailwind component, perhaps flight crew had an unfortunate case of Get-there-itis. Not sure what was their alternate, nor whether at the alternate.

Note the regional carriers only get paid to "move the rig" from point A to point B. Would be interesting to review stats on how many Regional flights end up diverting to alternates, versus how many Mainline flights involve a diversion
ppcflyer777 1
The airline only gets paid for A to B but the pilots and flight attendants get paid by the flight hour.
Pa Thomas 1
"suffered a runway excursion"

Reading this crap is torture.......
Could have been worse. Could have said "excursion from the tarmac."
notarookie 3
I love tarmac & cheese
John Smythe 2
Ya, I guess it would be politically incorrect to refer to it as a “ bit of a wipe out” but with a good ending.
Kobe Hunte -6
So pilot error is to do with it?
Kobe Hunte 1
I was just asking a question and got downvoted like crazy...

[This poster has been suspended.]

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

Andy Bowland 7
You can't possibly be serious...
notarookie 1
surely ???
ppcflyer777 1
For some GA airplanes, after touchdown, that can help. That is not how you do it in this jet or any other that I am aware of.


Don't have an account? Register now (free) for customized features, flight alerts, and more!
This website uses cookies. By using and further navigating this website, you accept this.
Did you know that FlightAware flight tracking is supported by advertising?
You can help us keep FlightAware free by allowing ads from We work hard to keep our advertising relevant and unobtrusive to create a great experience. It's quick and easy to whitelist ads on FlightAware or please consider our premium accounts.