Back to Squawk list
  • 26

Sonic Cruiser Returns, Quietly

Submitted
You thought the Sonic Cruiser was dead -- sacrificed more than nine years ago for the 787-yielding Super Efficient. (www.flightglobal.com) More...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


Falconus
Falconus 1
I wonder what at what speed that airplane is most efficient. As it said, at its normal speed, there would be a lot of extra drag due to approaching the sound barrier. Would it be more efficient at say, mach .85, and if so, what would the fuel burn be? I know that probably nobody here has an idea, I'm just curious to know whether if at normal (say, Mach .85) speed, it would be more or less efficient than a conventional similarly-sized aircraft. Then of course you could always fly it much faster if you needed to for some reason.
Derg
Roland Dent 1
Ba assured that this machine will be more efficient over M1. Ya casnnot design it any other way unless they are usin some kinda secret propulsion sysytem.
99NY
99NY 1
Looks alot like an up-sized Beriev Be-200 with a more blended and further aft wing.
captainjman
Jason Feldman 0
There is not a huge significant flight time from .85 to .98. Now if it was supersonic and economical - now that would be worth it.

Login

Don't have an account? Register now (free) for customized features, flight alerts, and more!
Did you know that FlightAware flight tracking is supported by advertising?
You can help us keep FlightAware free by allowing ads from FlightAware.com. We work hard to keep our advertising relevant and unobtrusive to create a great experience. It's quick and easy to whitelist ads on FlightAware or please consider our premium accounts.
Dismiss